Way v. Johnson
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JOHN L. WAY, SR., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. 11-1182 (RJL) v. ) ) ISAAC JOHNSON, et al, ) ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER tt- For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this 2-' day of
September 20 12, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 3006A [Dkt. # 13] is DENIED; it is further
ORDERED that Defendants Warden Simon T. Wainwright and Warden Isaac
Johnson's Motion for Additional Time to File a Response to the Complaint [Dkt. # 16]
and Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiffs
Complaint [Dkt. #28] are GRANTED nunc pro tunc; it is further
ORDERED that Warden Simon T ..Wainwright's Motion to Dismiss or in the
Alternative for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 19] is GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that Defendant Isaac Johnson's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #21] or, in
the Alternative, for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #22] is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #29] is GRANTED; and it
is further
ORDERED that plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED as to all defendants.
This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).
SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Way v. Johnson (Way v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.