Way v. Johnson
This text of Way v. Johnson (Way v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JOHN L. WAY, SR., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. 11-1182 (RJL) v. ) ) ISAAC JOHNSON, et al, ) ) ) Defendant. )
ORDER tt- For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this 2-' day of
September 20 12, it is hereby
ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 3006A [Dkt. # 13] is DENIED; it is further
ORDERED that Defendants Warden Simon T. Wainwright and Warden Isaac
Johnson's Motion for Additional Time to File a Response to the Complaint [Dkt. # 16]
and Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Response to Plaintiffs
Complaint [Dkt. #28] are GRANTED nunc pro tunc; it is further
ORDERED that Warden Simon T ..Wainwright's Motion to Dismiss or in the
Alternative for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 19] is GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that Defendant Isaac Johnson's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #21] or, in
the Alternative, for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #22] is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #29] is GRANTED; and it
is further
ORDERED that plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED as to all defendants.
This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a).
SO ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Way v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/way-v-johnson-dcd-2012.