Watts v. White Hickory Wagon Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Watts v. White Hickory Wagon Co.

34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 809, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 457

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 27, 1899

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 34 S.E. 147 (Watts v. White Hickory Wagon Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watts v. White Hickory Wagon Co., 34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 809, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 457 (Ga. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Little, J.

There was no error in overruling a so-ealled “extraordinary” motion for a new trial, filed after the expiration of the term at which the verdict complained of was rendered, when it appears that the same was based on grounds of which the movant might have taken advantage before the close of the term, and upon alleged newly discovered evidence which might, by the exercise of proper diligence, have been obtained and used at the trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Little, J.

There was no error in overruling a so-ealled “extraordinary” motion for a new trial, filed after the expiration of the term at which the verdict complained of was rendered, when it appears that the same was based on grounds of which the movant might have taken advantage before the close of the term, and upon alleged newly discovered evidence which might, by the exercise of proper diligence, have been obtained and used at the trial. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 809, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watts-v-white-hickory-wagon-co-ga-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack