Watts v. White Hickory Wagon Co.
34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 809, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 457
Opinion
There was no error in overruling a so-ealled “extraordinary” motion for a new trial, filed after the expiration of the term at which the verdict complained of was rendered, when it appears that the same was based on grounds of which the movant might have taken advantage before the close of the term, and upon alleged newly discovered evidence which might, by the exercise of proper diligence, have been obtained and used at the trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watts v. White Hickory Wagon Co., 34 S.E. 147, 108 Ga. 809, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 457 (Ga. 1899).
34 S.E. 147 (Watts v. White Hickory Wagon Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago, R.I. P. R. Co. v. Hine
1916 OK 651 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Lusk v. Pugh
1916 OK 668 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Dixon v. Mutual Life Industrial Ass'n
60 S.E. 207 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)