Watson v. Watson

646 So. 2d 297, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12283, 1994 WL 700085
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1994·No. No. 94-911·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a marital dissolution judgment. We affirm in all respects except the order that the marital home be partitioned. Neither party requested it, it was not a part of any pleadings or raised in evidence, and thus was not an issue for the judge to decide. Willis v. Willis, 574 So.2d 328 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Martinez v. Martinez, 573 So.2d 37, 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), rev. den., 581 So.2d 1309 (Fla.1991); Britt v. Britt, 552 So.2d 323, 324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Borntraeger v. Borntraeger, 521 So.2d 125, 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. den., 531 So.2d 1352 (Fla.1988).

The order of partition is quashed. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. Watson, 646 So. 2d 297, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12283, 1994 WL 700085 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

646 So. 2d 297 (Watson v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hodges v. Hodges
128 So. 3d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Smith v. Smith
896 So. 2d 818 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)