Britt v. Britt

552 So. 2d 323, 1989 WL 139119
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 1989
Docket88-3101
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 552 So. 2d 323 (Britt v. Britt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Britt v. Britt, 552 So. 2d 323, 1989 WL 139119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

552 So.2d 323 (1989)

Louie E. BRITT, Appellant,
v.
Catherine A. BRITT, Appellee.

No. 88-3101.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

November 21, 1989.

Richard D. Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Russell L. Healey of Lacy Mahon, Jr. and Mark H. Mahon, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.

THOMPSON, Judge.

The former husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which, inter alia, requires the parties' real property to be sold and the proceeds divided, orders the husband to pay $100 per week child *324 support and convey a Chevrolet pick up truck to the former wife, and which awards the wife a mortgage held by the parties as lump sum alimony. We affirm the final judgment with the exception of the portion which orders the sale of the parties' real property.

Partition of the property was not sought or agreed to by the parties, and a court in a dissolution proceeding has no authority to partition jointly owned property absent an agreement of the parties or appropriate pleadings. Borntraeger v. Borntraeger, 521 So.2d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) review denied 531 So.2d 1352 (Fla. 1988). A general prayer to equitably divide jointly held property does not constitute a prayer for partition. Cyphers v. Cyphers, 373 So.2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The remaining issues are without merit.

We therefore reverse only that portion of the final judgment which directs that the real property owned by the parties shall be sold and the proceeds divided between the parties. This reversal is without prejudice to either party to properly seek partition if so desired. In all other respects, the final judgment of dissolution of marriage is affirmed. REVERSED in part, AFFIRMED in part.

SMITH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Becker v. Becker
778 So. 2d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Watson v. Watson
646 So. 2d 297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Willis v. Willis
574 So. 2d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Martinez v. Martinez
573 So. 2d 37 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
552 So. 2d 323, 1989 WL 139119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/britt-v-britt-fladistctapp-1989.