Watson v. State
This text of 78 S.E. 1014 (Watson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The credibility of witnesses is a matter exclusively for the jury, and when, on the trial of a criminal case (in which there is no complaint of error of law), a witness testifies positively to all of the facts essential to constitute the offense charged, this court can not interfere with the verdict, no matter how many witnesses may have testified to the contrary or how many circumstances may have been adduced tending to disprove the testimony of the single witness. Chatman [182]*182v. State, 8 Ga. App. 842 (70 S. E. 188); Jolly v. State, 5 Ga. App. 454 (63 8. E. 520); Barber v. State, 3 Ga. App. 598 (60 S. E. 285).
2. There is no limitation to the power of the jury to credit a witness, unless the facts testified to by him be inherently at variance with the common knowledge and experience of mankind. A witness impeached for general bad character, or for contradictory statements out of court, •nay be restored to credit. Civil Code, § 5884. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 S.E. 1014, 13 Ga. App. 181, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-state-gactapp-1913.