Jolly v. State

63 S.E. 520, 5 Ga. App. 454, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 20
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 27, 1909·No. 1511·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

The determination of the credibility of the witnesses is so-exclusively within the province of the jury that the verdict finding a defendant guilty is not affected by the fact that that verdict is supported by the testimony of only one witness, whose testimony is directly in conflict with a large number of witnesses who had equal opportunity of knowing the facts, and' who, so far as appears from the record, are-worthy of credit. In the absence of any error on the part of the court or any irregularity which may have prejudiced the defendant, such a verdict, approved by the trial judge, is absolutely conclusive; because this court is without jurisdiction to review a finding upon the-facts, which is supported by sufficient evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jolly v. State, 63 S.E. 520, 5 Ga. App. 454, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 20 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

63 S.E. 520 (Jolly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whitener v. State
148 S.E. 305 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Oliver v. State
127 S.E. 477 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Calhoun v. State
87 S.E. 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Brown v. State
17 Ga. App. 402 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Butts v. State
82 S.E. 377 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Cook v. State
79 S.E. 87 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Watson v. State
78 S.E. 1014 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Holloway v. State
72 S.E. 512 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)