Watson v. State

807 So. 2d 166, 2002 WL 215341
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 2002·No. 3D01-1649·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

807 So.2d 166 (2002)

Cornilius Erick WATSON, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D01-1649.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 13, 2002.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Sandra R. Braverman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LEVY and RAMIREZ, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

As the State appropriately acknowledges, this case must be remanded for the sole purpose of allowing the trial judge to enter appropriate written orders revoking the appellant's probation based upon the evidence heard by the trial judge.

In all other respects, this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 807 So. 2d 166, 2002 WL 215341 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

807 So. 2d 166 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burt v. State
931 So. 2d 1005 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Centano v. State
880 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)