Watson v. State

774 So. 2d 902, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 24, 2001 WL 6186
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 749 So. 2d 556
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 3, 2001·No. No. 4D99-2733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of armed burglary with a firearm, aggravated assault, and the false imprisonment of four people. Pursuant to section 775.082(8), Florida Statutes (1997), the Prison Releas-ee Reoffender Punishment Act (PRRA), he was given a life sentence to be served concurrently with five five-year sentences. He also received a life sentence and five ten-year sentences as a Habitual Felony Offender (HFO) pursuant to section 775.084. According to Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000), such dual sentences are not unconstitutional, and because the five HFO sentences exceed the PRRA sentences, they are authorized by the PRRA. The concurrent HFO life sentence, however, is not authorized by the PRRA. Affirmed in part and reversed in part for resentencing consistent with Grant.

STONE, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 774 So. 2d 902, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 24, 2001 WL 6186 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

774 So. 2d 902 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)