Watson v. State

710 So. 2d 654, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4272, 1998 WL 187415
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 1998·No. No. 97-1213·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

KAHN, Judge.

Appellant Watson pled guilty to two counts of burglary. A sentencing guideline score-sheet prepared for Watson scored him at 30.4 points, thus establishing a guidelines sanction of other than a state prison sentence. § 921.0014(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). Nevertheless, the trial court noted two reasons for departure and sentenced appellant to twenty-four months in State prison. Although appellant now challenges the sentence, he neither objected to the departure, nor filed a motion under Rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The twenty-four month sentence is clearly not illegal. See Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, the issue has not been properly preserved for appeal by appellant’s court-appointed counsel. See Middleton v. State, 689 So.2d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED.

MINER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 710 So. 2d 654, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 4272, 1998 WL 187415 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

710 So. 2d 654 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nobles v. State
734 So. 2d 1075 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
O'Donovan v. Citibank
710 So. 2d 654 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)