Watson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Watson v. State

667 So. 2d 955, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1385, 1996 WL 60508

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 1996

DocketNo. 94-4333

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 667 So. 2d 955 (Watson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. State, 667 So. 2d 955, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1385, 1996 WL 60508 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, we affirm appellant’s convictions without discussion. However, we strike from the costs imposed with regard to count II the “additional court cost” of $25.00, because no statutory authority was cited to support this cost; and all of the remaining costs imposed with regard to count II as duplicative of those imposed with regard to count I. Stephens v. State, 667 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the $25.00 “additional court cost,” if it cites the statutory authority for that assessment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, we affirm appellant’s convictions without discussion. However, we strike from the costs imposed with regard to count II the “additional court cost” of $25.00, because no statutory authority was cited to support this cost; and all of the remaining costs imposed with regard to count II as duplicative of those imposed with regard to count I. Stephens v. State, 667 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Hunter v. State, 651 So.2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). On remand, the trial court may reimpose the $25.00 “additional court cost,” if it cites the statutory authority for that assessment.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

ERVIN, MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

667 So. 2d 955, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1385, 1996 WL 60508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack