Watson v. State

647 So. 2d 245, 1994 WL 637681
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1994·No. 93-01585·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

647 So.2d 245 (1994)

Robert Lee WATSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 93-01585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 16, 1994.

David C. Dwiggins, Lakeland, for appellant.

Robert Lee Watson, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Christopher M. Sierra, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we find merit only in appellant's argument that the imposition of $2.00 in costs was improper because appellant was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard. We agree and order those $2.00 costs stricken. See Williams v. State, 601 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We otherwise affirm.

FRANK, C.J., and CAMPBELL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 647 So. 2d 245, 1994 WL 637681 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

647 So. 2d 245 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. State
667 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Gray v. State
667 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Stillings v. State
685 So. 2d 852 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Osborne Stern and Co. v. Dept. of Banking
647 So. 2d 245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)