Watson v. State
442 So. 2d 324, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24544
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 410 So. 2d 207 →
Opinion
Appellant, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that appellant is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. See Hitchcock v. State, 432 So.2d 42 (Fla.1983); Palmes v. State, 425 So.2d 4 (Fla.1983); Raulerson v. State, 420 So.2d 567 (Fla.1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. State, 442 So. 2d 324, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24544 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
442 So. 2d 324 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palmes v. State
425 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Hitchcock v. State
432 So. 2d 42 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Raulerson v. State
420 So. 2d 567 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)