Watson v. State

439 So. 2d 271, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24575
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 1983·No. No. 82-1510·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse appellant’s conviction of burglary because it appears without contradiction that appellant was invited to enter and remain in the structure in question by the complaining witness. See Section 810.02(1), Florida Statutes (1979) and State v. Hicks, 421 So.2d 510 (Fla.1982). The remaining judgments and sentences' are affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 439 So. 2d 271, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24575 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

439 So. 2d 271 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thorpe v. State
559 So. 2d 1285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)