Watson v. State

451 So. 2d 373
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 10, 1984·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for writ of error coram nobis in which petitioner alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. The petition was denied without an evidentiary hearing.

The sworn petition contains specific charges against trial counsel for appellant. These allegations or charges are not mere conclusions but meet the requirements this court has set forth in many cases.

Without ruling on the truth or substance of the allegations, we conclude that petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing at the trial court level. David v. State, 416 So.2d 778 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982).

Accordingly, we have no alternative but to remand this cause with instructions that the appellant be given an evidentiary hearing on the matters set forth in the petition.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 451 So. 2d 373 (Ala. Ct. App. 1984).

451 So. 2d 373 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll v. State
706 So. 2d 815 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Slater v. State
672 So. 2d 1312 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1993)
Whitehead v. State
616 So. 2d 359 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Whited v. State
623 So. 2d 352 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Pitts v. State
605 So. 2d 1253 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Wilson v. State
598 So. 2d 1055 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Henley v. State
582 So. 2d 590 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)
Ex Parte Boatwright
471 So. 2d 1257 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Watson v. State
451 So. 2d 374 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)