Watson v. HARRIS CLAY COMPANY
89 S.E.2d 465, 242 N.C. 763, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 680
Opinion
When there is any competent evidence to support a finding of fact by the Industrial Commission, such finding is conclusive on appeal, even though there is evidence that would have supported a finding to the contrary. Creighton v. Snipes, 227 N.C. 90, 40 S.E. 2d 612; Rewis v. Insurance Co., 226 N.C. 325, 38 S.E. 2d 97. Therefore, in light of the Commission's findings of fact, the judgment of the court below must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. HARRIS CLAY COMPANY, 89 S.E.2d 465, 242 N.C. 763, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 680 (N.C. 1955).
89 S.E.2d 465 (Watson v. HARRIS CLAY COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Snow v. Dick & Kirkman, Inc.
328 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
McRae v. Wall
133 S.E.2d 220 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Hudson v. Whitford Motor Co.
104 S.E.2d 878 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
English Mica Co. v. Avery County Board of Education
100 S.E.2d 72 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Champion v. Hardin-Dixon Tractor Co.
99 S.E.2d 917 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Conner v. United States Rubber Co.
94 S.E.2d 486 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)
Blalock v. City of Durham
92 S.E.2d 758 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)