Hudson v. Whitford Motor Co.
This text of 104 S.E.2d 878 (Hudson v. Whitford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only question presented by defendants’ assignments of error is whether there is any competent evidence to support the full Commission’s findings of fact and conclusions of law to the effect that Stanley Hudson’s death on January 11, 1956, was by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment by Whitford Motor Company. After careful study of the record, we conclude that this question must be answered in the affirmative. Hence, the judgment must be and is affirmed. Champion v. Tractor Co., 246 N.C. 691, 99 S.E. 2d 917; Watson v. Clay Co., 242 N.C. 763, 89 S.E. 2d 465, and cases cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 S.E.2d 878, 248 N.C. 720, 1958 N.C. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hudson-v-whitford-motor-co-nc-1958.