Watson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Watson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

36 A. 555, 68 N.H. 170

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 A. 555 (Watson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co., 36 A. 555, 68 N.H. 170 (N.H. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Chase, J.

The decision of this cause was deferred to await the determination of the action, Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Berlin, ante, p. 168. By the judgment in that case, it is established that there was, as against these defendants, no lawful highway at the place of the alleged incumbrance.

Verdict set aside.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase, J.

The decision of this cause was deferred to await the determination of the action, Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Berlin, ante, p. 168. By the judgment in that case, it is established that there was, as against these defendants, no lawful highway at the place of the alleged incumbrance.

Verdict set aside.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 A. 555, 68 N.H. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-grand-trunk-railway-co-nh-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack