Watson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Watson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.

36 A. 555, 68 N.H. 170

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Chase, J.

The decision of this cause was deferred to await the determination of the action, Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Berlin, ante, p. 168. By the judgment in that case, it is established that there was, as against these defendants, no lawful highway at the place of the alleged incumbrance.

Verdict set aside.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase, J.

The decision of this cause was deferred to await the determination of the action, Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. Berlin, ante, p. 168. By the judgment in that case, it is established that there was, as against these defendants, no lawful highway at the place of the alleged incumbrance.

Verdict set aside.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Watson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co., 36 A. 555, 68 N.H. 170 (N.H. 1894).

Pincite

36 A. 555 (Watson v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related