Watkinson v. Laughton
4 Johns. 307
This text of 4 Johns. 307 (Watkinson v. Laughton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Watkinson v. Laughton, 4 Johns. 307 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
Opinion
This is a new application to this court, founded on a notice, in the usual way; it is, therefore, proper to receive new affidavits.
We consider the affidavit of the plaintiff which was read as sufficient, and the motion must, therefore, be denied.
Rule refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Doremus v. Kinney
3 Denio 178 (New York Supreme Court, 1846)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Johns. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkinson-v-laughton-nysupct-1809.