Watkinson v. Laughton

4 Johns. 307

New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Spencer, J.

This is a new application to this court, founded on a notice, in the usual way; it is, therefore, proper to receive new affidavits.

Per Curiam.

We consider the affidavit of the plaintiff which was read as sufficient, and the motion must, therefore, be denied.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkinson v. Laughton, 4 Johns. 307 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).

Pincite

4 Johns. 307 (Watkinson v. Laughton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.