Doremus v. Kinney

3 Denio 178
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1846·Published

Opinion

By the Court, Bronson, Ch. J.

Trover is an action in which the defendant may be held to bail as a matter of course. (2 R. S. [179]*179348, § 7.) And in such cases, if the defendant wishes relief, he is not at liberty to come here in the first instance; but must apply to a judge at chambers for an order that the plaintiff show cause of action, or that the bail be mitigated. (Smith v. Newell, 7 Wend. 484.) And if either party is dissatisfied with the decision of the judge, the matter should be brought up by way of appeal. It cannot be proper to come here by way of original application. The case of Watkinson v. Laughton, (4 John. 307,) was an appeal; and in Hart v. Faulkener, (5 id. 362,) the motion was that an exoneretur be entered on the bail-piece ; which was an application that had not been, and could not be made before a judge at chambers.

The motion must be denied; but without prejudice to any further application to the circuit judge, or an appeal from the order which he has already made.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doremus v. Kinney, 3 Denio 178 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

3 Denio 178 (Doremus v. Kinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watkinson v. Laughton
4 Johns. 307 (New York Supreme Court, 1809)
Smith v. Newell
7 Wend. 484 (New York Supreme Court, 1832)