Watkins v. Stulb

98 S.E. 94, 23 Ga. App. 181, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 26
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 14, 1919
Docket9603
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 98 S.E. 94 (Watkins v. Stulb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watkins v. Stulb, 98 S.E. 94, 23 Ga. App. 181, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 26 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Stulb & Vorhauer, plaintiffs in the court below, were the holders of a lease contract from the Glenn Springs Company, of Spartanburg, South Carolina, of the Glenn Springs Hotel property (which was a summer hotel) for the season of 1915, at a rental of $3,500. On April 1, 1915, this lease was transferred to Bryan Lawrence, by a written contract signed by the plaintiffs and by Lawrence which provided that the lease was.to begin on that date and end November 1, 1915. About May 20, 1915, J. H. Milligan, who testified that he had been requested by Bryan Lawrence, prior to April 1, to operate the hotel for him during the season of 1915, went with Watkins, attorney for Bryan Lawrence, to Glenn Springs, and went over the hotel to ascertain its condition, for the purpose of opening the hotel in June. On their return to Augusta, they notified the plaintiffs that the president of the Glenn Springs Company informed them that the [184]*184company liad never consented to the transfer of the lease to Bryan Lawrence. Thereupon Vorhauer, one of the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ attorney, went to Glenn Springs, and on May 26, 1915, obtained the written consent of the Glenn Springs Company for Bryan Lawrence to operate the hotel during the season of 1915, without releasing the plaintiffs from their liability to pay the rent, and on the next day copies of this written consent were delivered to Watkins, the attorney, and Milligan, the agent, of Bryan Lawrence, and about June 1, 1915, Milligan went to Glenn Springs, took charge-of the hotel as the agent of Lawrence, and opened and operated it during the summer season of 1915. On June 2, 1915, Bryan Lawrence executed a power of attorney to his son, E. L. Lawrence, empowering him to do any and all things necessary for the operation of the Glenn Springs Hotel during the season of 1915. Bryan Lawrence went to the hospital some time during the month of April, 1915, and was in the hospital most of the time until his death in March, 1916. He died testate, leaving as the executors of his will Joseph S. Watkins, his attorney, and T. J. Morrow. On’ September 27, 1915, during the lifetime of Bryan Lawrence, the plaintiffs brought suit against him to recover the rental of the hotel, whereujwn lunacy proceedings were instituted, and his son, E. L. Lawrence, was appointed as guardian, and filed a defense in this case, setting up (1) that Bryan Lawrence was insane at the time of the execution of the alleged contract, and therefore not bound by its terms; and (2) that the plaintiffs failed to deliver the hotel property to Bryan Lawrence, or his agents, at the time specified in the contract, and that this failure to so deliver said hotel relieved Bryan Lawrence of the contract, or if it' did not wholly relieve him of the contract, he was entitled to have credit for whatever damages he suffered by reason of such delayed delivery. Upon the death of Bryan Lawrence his executors were made parties defendant, and upon the trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, for the full amount siiecl for. The defendants made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and to this ruling the defendants excepted.

Upon the question of the plaintiffs’ rights under a 'contract where. a plea of insanity had been interposed in behalf of the defendant, the judge charged the jury in substantial accord with the principles of law set forth in the first headnote of this opinion. On each of the issues of fact as made by the evidence upon the [185]*185several questions thus involved, the jury was authorized to find in favor of the plaintiffs. The rulings stated in the headnotes do not require elaboration.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Smith
152 S.E.2d 560 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Carr v. Sparks
100 S.E.2d 583 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Jenkins v. Smith
88 S.E.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Jones v. Smith
56 S.E.2d 462 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Georgia Power Company v. Roper
41 S.E.2d 226 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Georgia Power Company v. Roper
38 S.E.2d 91 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Snow v. Snow
30 S.E.2d 823 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Saul
5 S.E.2d 214 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Gormley v. McMillan
180 S.E. 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Atlanta Banking & Savings Co. v. Johnson
175 S.E. 904 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Eady v. Jackson
173 S.E. 475 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
McLendon v. City of LaGrange
171 S.E. 307 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Perry v. Fletcher
167 S.E. 796 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Hannan v. Dusch
153 S.E. 824 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1930)
Decatur County v. O'Neal
142 S.E. 914 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Miller
141 S.E. 419 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Kokomo Rubber Co. v. Anderson
125 S.E. 783 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Waters v. Wells
117 S.E. 322 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 S.E. 94, 23 Ga. App. 181, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-stulb-gactapp-1919.