Perry v. Fletcher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Perry v. Fletcher

167 S.E. 796, 46 Ga. App. 450, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 93

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 14, 1933

Docket22174

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 167 S.E. 796 (Perry v. Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Perry v. Fletcher, 167 S.E. 796, 46 Ga. App. 450, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 93 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. A person who is non compos mentis, feeble-minded, and incapable of handling his properly, or of understanding or completing the simplest business transaction, although he may not have been legally-[451]*451adjudged a lunatic or a person non compos mentis, is incapable of binding his estate by any contract entered into by him, and is incapable of accepting service or defending a lawsuit instituted against him; and where such a person was sued upon what purported to be a contractual obligation entered into by him, and was served only by the leaving of a copy of the petition and process at his residence, and was not represented in the suit by any guardian or other person appointed to look after his interests, a judgment rendered against him in the suit may, in a proper proceeding brought in his behalf, be set aside as invalid. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4232, 4237; Foster v. Jones, 23 Ga. 168; Ward v. Miller, 143 Ga. 164 (84 S. E. 480); Watkins v. Stulb, 23 Ga. App. 181 (98 S. E. 94). Such insane person may, after the time for excepting to the judgment has expired, institute, by next friend, in the court in which the judgment was rendered, proceedings in the nature of a motion to set aside the judgment as being void. This is true notwithstanding the plaintiff in the suit in which the judgment was rendered is a nonresident of the county. Dixon v. Baxter, 106 Ga. 180 (32 S. E. 24); Union Compress Co. v. Leffler, 122 Ga. 640 (50 S. E. 483) ; Schulze v. Schulze, 149 Ga. 532 (101 S. E. 183) ; Perry v. Fletcher, 174 Ga. 180 (162 S. E. 285).

Decided February 14, 1933. Philip Newbern, IJ. L. Rogers, McDonald & McDonald, for plaintiff in error. R. D. Smith, Jay & Garden, contra.

2. The petition, which was one in the nature of a motion to set aside the judgment complained of, set out a cause of action, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Button, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

1. A person who is non compos mentis, feeble-minded, and incapable of handling his properly, or of understanding or completing the simplest business transaction, although he may not have been legally-[451]*451adjudged a lunatic or a person non compos mentis, is incapable of binding his estate by any contract entered into by him, and is incapable of accepting service or defending a lawsuit instituted against him; and where such a person was sued upon what purported to be a contractual obligation entered into by him, and was served only by the leaving of a copy of the petition and process at his residence, and was not represented in the suit by any guardian or other person appointed to look after his interests, a judgment rendered against him in the suit may, in a proper proceeding brought in his behalf, be set aside as invalid. Civil Code (1910), §§ 4232, 4237; Foster v. Jones, 23 Ga. 168; Ward v. Miller, 143 Ga. 164 (84 S. E. 480); Watkins v. Stulb, 23 Ga. App. 181 (98 S. E. 94). Such insane person may, after the time for excepting to the judgment has expired, institute, by next friend, in the court in which the judgment was rendered, proceedings in the nature of a motion to set aside the judgment as being void. This is true notwithstanding the plaintiff in the suit in which the judgment was rendered is a nonresident of the county. Dixon v. Baxter, 106 Ga. 180 (32 S. E. 24); Union Compress Co. v. Leffler, 122 Ga. 640 (50 S. E. 483) ; Schulze v. Schulze, 149 Ga. 532 (101 S. E. 183) ; Perry v. Fletcher, 174 Ga. 180 (162 S. E. 285).

Decided February 14, 1933. Philip Newbern, IJ. L. Rogers, McDonald & McDonald, for plaintiff in error. R. D. Smith, Jay & Garden, contra.

2. The petition, which was one in the nature of a motion to set aside the judgment complained of, set out a cause of action, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Button, J., eoneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 S.E. 796, 46 Ga. App. 450, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/perry-v-fletcher-gactapp-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack