Watkins v. Robinson
This text of 451 A.2d 266 (Watkins v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The procedural posture of this appeal is essentially identical to that of Johnson v. Keystone Insurance Company, 299 Pa.Super.Ct. 187, 445 A.2d 517 (1982). Accordingly, we shall vacate the order dismissing appellant’s complaint for noncompliance with the “240 Day Rule” and Philadelphia Rule of Civil Procedure 151, and remand the case to the court below for further proceedings consistent with the opinion in Johnson v. Keystone Insurance Company, supra.
Order vacated, and case remanded for further proceedings. Jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
451 A.2d 266, 305 Pa. Super. 108, 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 5504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-robinson-pasuperct-1982.