Watkins v. Jenks
This text of 24 Ga. 431 (Watkins v. Jenks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court. delivering the opinion.
In Norton vs. Cobb & Crawford, (20 Ga. Rep. 44,) this Court held, that a transfer of a stock of goods, by a debtor, in .failing circumstances, to B., a creditor, with power to sell the same at public auction, and after applying the proceeds to the extinguishment of A’s debt, the balance to be turned over to C, to be used and appropriated to the satisfaction of his [434]*434demand, and the residue to D, for a like purpose, was void; as falling within the prohibition of the statute of 1818, against partial assignments.
Our judgment is, that the transfer in this case is covered by that decision. It is neither a sale nor a mortgage, but a partial assignment by a debtor in failing circumstances, a no'1 in violation of the Act of 1818.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Ga. 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-jenks-ga-1858.