Watkins v. Jenks

24 Ga. 431
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

By the Court. delivering the opinion.

In Norton vs. Cobb & Crawford, (20 Ga. Rep. 44,) this Court held, that a transfer of a stock of goods, by a debtor, in .failing circumstances, to B., a creditor, with power to sell the same at public auction, and after applying the proceeds to the extinguishment of A’s debt, the balance to be turned over to C, to be used and appropriated to the satisfaction of his [434]*434demand, and the residue to D, for a like purpose, was void; as falling within the prohibition of the statute of 1818, against partial assignments.

Our judgment is, that the transfer in this case is covered by that decision. It is neither a sale nor a mortgage, but a partial assignment by a debtor in failing circumstances, a no'1 in violation of the Act of 1818.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Jenks, 24 Ga. 431 (Ga. 1858).

24 Ga. 431 (Watkins v. Jenks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lamb & Mathis v. Radcliff
28 Ga. 520 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1859)