Lamb & Mathis v. Radcliff

Supreme Court of Georgia

Lamb & Mathis v. Radcliff

28 Ga. 520

DecidedJune 15, 1859

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Ga. 520 (Lamb & Mathis v. Radcliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lamb & Mathis v. Radcliff, 28 Ga. 520 (Ga. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

We are unable to distinguish this, from, the cases of Norton vs. Cobb, (20 Ga. Rep., 44,) and Watkins vs. Jenks & Ogden, (24 Ga. Rep., 431). This transfer, like the two in those cases, is an. assignment in trust to a certain preferred creditor by an insolvent debtor; the very thing prohibited by the act of 1818.

Judgment affirmed.

Judge Stephens absent, on account of the illness of one of his children.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

We are unable to distinguish this, from, the cases of Norton vs. Cobb, (20 Ga. Rep., 44,) and Watkins vs. Jenks & Ogden, (24 Ga. Rep., 431). This transfer, like the two in those cases, is an. assignment in trust to a certain preferred creditor by an insolvent debtor; the very thing prohibited by the act of 1818.

Judgment affirmed.

Judge Stephens absent, on account of the illness of one of his children.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Ga. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lamb-mathis-v-radcliff-ga-1859.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack