Watkins v. Conway

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Watkins v. Conway

137 S.E.2d 763, 110 Ga. App. 96, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 554

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 16, 1964

Docket40799

StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E.2d 763 (Watkins v. Conway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watkins v. Conway, 137 S.E.2d 763, 110 Ga. App. 96, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 554 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Franicum, Judge.

“To a petition seeking to enforce a foreign judgment the defendant interposed a challenge reciting merely that he ‘generally demurs to the petition.’ This did not raise the defense of a bar by a statute of limitation since the statute must be expressly invoked to raise such defense. Consolidated Distributors, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 193 Ga. 853, 855 (20 SE2d 421).” Watkins v. Conway, 220 Ga. 27 (136 SE2d 756). The trial court treated the challenge to the petition as a general demurrer and sustained the same. Regardless of whether the trial court was correct in so treating the challenge, the petition was sufficient to set forth a cause of action as against the challenge made against it, and the court erred in sustaining such challenge.

Judgment reversed.

Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franicum, Judge.

“To a petition seeking to enforce a foreign judgment the defendant interposed a challenge reciting merely that he ‘generally demurs to the petition.’ This did not raise the defense of a bar by a statute of limitation since the statute must be expressly invoked to raise such defense. Consolidated Distributors, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 193 Ga. 853, 855 (20 SE2d 421).” Watkins v. Conway, 220 Ga. 27 (136 SE2d 756). The trial court treated the challenge to the petition as a general demurrer and sustained the same. Regardless of whether the trial court was correct in so treating the challenge, the petition was sufficient to set forth a cause of action as against the challenge made against it, and the court erred in sustaining such challenge.

Judgment reversed.

Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S.E.2d 763, 110 Ga. App. 96, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watkins-v-conway-gactapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack