Watkins v. Conway

137 S.E.2d 763, 110 Ga. App. 96, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 554
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 16, 1964·No. 40799·Published

Opinion

Franicum, Judge.

“To a petition seeking to enforce a foreign judgment the defendant interposed a challenge reciting merely that he ‘generally demurs to the petition.’ This did not raise the defense of a bar by a statute of limitation since the statute must be expressly invoked to raise such defense. Consolidated Distributors, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 193 Ga. 853, 855 (20 SE2d 421).” Watkins v. Conway, 220 Ga. 27 (136 SE2d 756). The trial court treated the challenge to the petition as a general demurrer and sustained the same. Regardless of whether the trial court was correct in so treating the challenge, the petition was sufficient to set forth a cause of action as against the challenge made against it, and the court erred in sustaining such challenge.

Judgment reversed.

Felton, C. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Conway, 137 S.E.2d 763, 110 Ga. App. 96, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 554 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964).

137 S.E.2d 763 (Watkins v. Conway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Consolidated Distributors Inc. v. City of Atlanta
20 S.E.2d 421 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Watkins v. Conway
136 S.E.2d 756 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)