Watkins v. Conway

136 S.E.2d 756, 220 Ga. 27, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 438
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 7, 1964·No. 22450·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

To a petition seeking to enforce a foreign judgment the defendant interposed a challenge reciting merely that he “generally demurs to the petition.” This did not raise the defense of a bar by a statute of limitation since the statute must be expressly invoked to raise such defense. Consolidated Distributors, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 193 Ga. 853, 855 (20 SE2d 421). It follows that petitioner’s attacks upon the constitutionality of the statute of limitation applicable in this type of action (Code § 3-701) fail to present any proper constitutional question and, there being no other basis for the jurisdiction of this court, that this court is without jurisdiction. Constitution of Georgia, Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV (Code Ann. § 2-3704).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers, McClatchey & Regenstein, William G. Vance, for plaintiff in error. McFarland & Cooper, Martin McFarland, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watkins v. Conway, 136 S.E.2d 756, 220 Ga. 27, 1964 Ga. LEXIS 438 (Ga. 1964).

136 S.E.2d 756 (Watkins v. Conway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watkins v. Conway
137 S.E.2d 763 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)