Waters v. Waters

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Waters v. Waters

508 So. 2d 762, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8901

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Waters v. Waters. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2632 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1987·No. No. BO-192·Published

Opinion

ON REHEARING

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Having granted appellant’s motion for rehearing, and the trial court having responded to our order relinquishing jurisdiction for the court to set forth its reasons for denying appellant’s claim to a special equity in the marital residence, and both parties having responded to the trial court’s order, we hold there to be sufficient evidence to support the denial. See Margantes v. Margantes, 422 So.2d 22 (Fla.2d DCA 1982). There being no showing of an abuse of discretion by the court as to the remaining points raised by appellant, the final judgment is

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON REHEARING

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Having granted appellant’s motion for rehearing, and the trial court having responded to our order relinquishing jurisdiction for the court to set forth its reasons for denying appellant’s claim to a special equity in the marital residence, and both parties having responded to the trial court’s order, we hold there to be sufficient evidence to support the denial. See Margantes v. Margantes, 422 So.2d 22 (Fla.2d DCA 1982). There being no showing of an abuse of discretion by the court as to the remaining points raised by appellant, the final judgment is

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Waters v. Waters, 508 So. 2d 762, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1460, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8901 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

508 So. 2d 762 (Waters v. Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related