Waters v. Waters

461 So. 2d 976, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2632, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16272
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 1984·No. No. AY-243·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage we find no abuse of the trial court’s discretion in equitably distributing the parties’ marital assets. See Cortina v. Cortina, 461 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA, 1984). We do hold, however, that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees to the wife when the record clearly shows that she has at least equal, if not greater, ability to pay those fees and does not require the husband’s assistance to provide herself with competent legal counsel. Cor-tina; Grundman v. Grundman, 448 So.2d 59 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). As was recognized by the court in McIntyre v. McIntyre, 434 So.2d 61 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983):

After making a truly equitable distribution of marital assets it is inequitable to diminish the assets awarded either party by requiring one party to pay the litigation costs of the other where each party has substantially equal ability to pay their own costs and expenses.

Id., at 62.

The final judgment is reversed as to the award of attorney’s fees, but affirmed in all other respects.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waters v. Waters, 461 So. 2d 976, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2632, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16272 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

461 So. 2d 976 (Waters v. Waters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charlebois v. Charlebois
574 So. 2d 1220 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Gustafson v. Jensen
523 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)