Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Commission

683 A.2d 399, 239 Conn. 930, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 428

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 10, 1996·No. SC 15544·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 700 (AC 14938), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the grievance hearings in this case did not constitute ‘meetings’ within the meaning of General Statutes § l-18a (b) because they constituted ‘strategy or negotiations’ within the meaning of the same statute?”

[931] Decided October 10, 1996 Joan M. Andrews, commission counsel, in support of the petition. William J. Dolan, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn. App. 700 (AC 14938), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the grievance hearings in this case did not constitute ‘meetings’ within the meaning of General Statutes § l-18a (b) because they constituted ‘strategy or negotiations’ within the meaning of the same statute?”

[931] Decided October 10, 1996 Joan M. Andrews, commission counsel, in support of the petition. William J. Dolan, in opposition.

Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Commission, 683 A.2d 399, 239 Conn. 930, 1996 Conn. LEXIS 428 (Colo. 1996).

Pincite

683 A.2d 399 (Waterbury Teachers Ass'n v. Freedom of Information Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related