Wasson v. Dyer

3 Colo. 398
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedOctober 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 Colo. 398 (Wasson v. Dyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wasson v. Dyer, 3 Colo. 398 (Colo. 1877).

Opinion

Thatcher, C. J.

Ho exception was reserved to the admission or rejection of testimony or to the instruction of the court. Hor was any exception taken to the decision of the court in overruling the motion for a new trial. Even had such exception been taken, this court would not examine the evidence for the purpose of determining whether it sustains the verdict, as the record does not purport to contain all the evidence. As not one of the specifications of [399]*399error rests upon an exception duly reserved, and as every error assigned is based upon matters in the bill of exceptions, it is obvious that there is no ground for disturbing the judgment. The jugment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Altman v. Hoffman
18 Colo. App. 283 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1903)
Packer v. People
26 Colo. 306 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Colo. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wasson-v-dyer-colo-1877.