Altman v. Hoffman

18 Colo. App. 283
Colorado Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1903·No. No. 2000·Published

Opinion

Thomson, J.

The appellee was plaintiff, and the appellants defendants, below. Error is assigned to the admission of evidence offered by the plaintiff, and to the final judgment. The defendants objected to the introduction of the evidence referred to; but it was received nevertheless, and they took no exception to the ruling; nor was there any exception to the judgment. By reason of the want of proper exceptions, the record presents no question for our determination.— Wasson v. Dyer, 3 Colo. 398; Burnell v. Wachtel, 4 Colo. App. 556; Mining Co. v. Burbridge, 11 Colo. App. 487.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Altman v. Hoffman, 18 Colo. App. 283 (Colo. Ct. App. 1903).

18 Colo. App. 283 (Altman v. Hoffman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wasson v. Dyer
3 Colo. 398 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1877)
Burnell v. Wachtel
4 Colo. App. 556 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1894)