Altman v. Hoffman
This text of 18 Colo. App. 283 (Altman v. Hoffman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellee was plaintiff, and the appellants defendants, below. Error is assigned to the admission of evidence offered by the plaintiff, and to the final judgment. The defendants objected to the introduction of the evidence referred to; but it was received nevertheless, and they took no exception to the ruling; nor was there any exception to the judgment. By reason of the want of proper exceptions, the record presents no question for our determination.— Wasson v. Dyer, 3 Colo. 398; Burnell v. Wachtel, 4 Colo. App. 556; Mining Co. v. Burbridge, 11 Colo. App. 487.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Colo. App. 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altman-v-hoffman-coloctapp-1903.