Washington v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Washington v. State

110 S.W.2d 66

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 17, 1937

DocketNo. 19218

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.W.2d 66 (Washington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. State, 110 S.W.2d 66 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is rape; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of the evidence which was adduced in the trial court, we are unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is rape; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of the evidence which was adduced in the trial court, we are unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 S.W.2d 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.