Washington v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Washington v. State

133 Tex. Crim. 275

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 17, 1937·No. No. 19218·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is rape; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of the evidence which was adduced in the trial court we are unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

The offense is rape; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for ten years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence of the evidence which was adduced in the trial court we are unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Washington v. State, 133 Tex. Crim. 275 (Tex. 1937).

Pincite

133 Tex. Crim. 275 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.