Washington v. State

750 So. 2d 118, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17263, 1999 WL 1259004
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1999·No. No. 99-01021·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BLUE, Acting Chief Judge.

Ronald Washington a/k/a Ronald Watson contends he improperly received a habitual offender sentence for possession of cocaine. We agree and reverse.

Washington appeared for resentencing on one count of possession of cocaine and one count of sale of cocaine after remand from this court. See Watson v. State, 718 So.2d 253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).1 Unfortunately, the trial judge, who was the original sentencing judge, was so busy complaining (with eheerleading from the prosecutor) about this court’s opinion and the individual judges of this court on that panel that he got the sentence wrong again. Section 775.084(l)(a)3, Florida Statutes (1995), does not permit a habitual offender sentence for a felony that is a violation of section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1995), relating to the purchase or possession of a controlled substance. See Livingston v. State, 682 So.2d 591 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Accordingly, we again reverse the sentence for possession of cocaine and remand to the trial court with directions that the sentence be corrected to remove the habitual offender designation.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

GREEN and STRINGER, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. State, 750 So. 2d 118, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17263, 1999 WL 1259004 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

750 So. 2d 118 (Washington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tyler v. State
826 So. 2d 1103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Owens v. State
792 So. 2d 650 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)