Washington v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Washington v. State

101 So. 918, 20 Ala. App. 354

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 11, 1924

Docket2 Div. 326

StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 918 (Washington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington v. State, 101 So. 918, 20 Ala. App. 354 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Parts of a still suitable for manufacturing whisky were shown to have been found in the possession, of defendant in the county and within three years before the finding of the indictment. The defendant admitted possession of'the articles testified to by the sheriff as being parts of a still, but denied that he possessed them for the purpose of manufacturing whisky. This made the question one for the determination of the jury and therefore the general charge as requested by defendant was properly refused.

'There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Parts of a still suitable for manufacturing whisky were shown to have been found in the possession, of defendant in the county and within three years before the finding of the indictment. The defendant admitted possession of'the articles testified to by the sheriff as being parts of a still, but denied that he possessed them for the purpose of manufacturing whisky. This made the question one for the determination of the jury and therefore the general charge as requested by defendant was properly refused.

'There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 So. 918, 20 Ala. App. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-v-state-alactapp-1924.