Washington v. Recuenco

546 U.S. 1087, 126 S. Ct. 1134

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Washington v. Recuenco. Read the opinion of the Court — 548 U.S. 212 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 9, 2006·No. No. 05-83·Published

Opinion

-Sup. Ct. Wash. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 960.] Motion of respondent for appointment of counsel granted. Gregory C. Link, Esq., of Seattle, Wash., is appointed to serve as counsel for respondent in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington v. Recuenco, 546 U.S. 1087, 126 S. Ct. 1134 (2006).

Pincite

546 U.S. 1087 (Washington v. Recuenco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.