Washington v. Downstate Administrative Nurse

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 18, 2022·No. 7:21-cv-07159·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JEREMIAH D. WALKER WASHINGTON JR., Plaintiff, No. 21-CV-7159 (KMK) v. ORDER OF SERVICE JOHN MORLEY, et al., Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at Woodbourne Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging deliberate indifference to a serious medical condition, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. By order dated September 23, 2021, Chief Judge Swain granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 I. Discussion A. Service on Defendants John Morley and Mikhail Gusman Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, Plaintiff is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that the summons and complaint be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued. If the complaint is not served within that time, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service); see also Murray

v. Pataki, 378 F. App’x 50, 52 (2d Cir. 2010) (summary order) (“As long as the [plaintiff proceeding IFP] provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the Marshals’ failure to effect service automatically constitutes ‘good cause’ for an extension of time within the meaning of Rule 4(m).”). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants Morley and Gusman through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each of these defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon these defendants.

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. Unidentified Defendants Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”) to identify the last name of Dr. Dinelio Doe, listed on page four of the amended complaint. It is therefore ordered that the New York State Attorney General, who is the attorney for and agent of the DOCCS, must ascertain the identity of this defendant and the address where this defendant may be served. The Attorney General must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file a second amended complaint naming Dr. Dinelio Doe with his or her full name. The second amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the amended complaint. A second amended complaint form that

Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint, the Court will issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the address for this defendant and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. C. Identifying Information for Doe Defendants Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff is directed to provide the Attorney General with more detailed, descriptive information for the remaining Doe Defendants to assist the Attorney General in identifying these Defendants. Within thirty days after Plaintiff provides this information, the Attorney General shall identify the defendants whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the addresses where these defendants may be served, and provide this information to the

Court and Plaintiff. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must name these defendants in his second amended complaint. Once Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint, the Court will issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the address for the newly named Doe Defendants and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. II. Conclusion The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue summonses for John Morley and Mikhail Gusman, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these defendants, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order and the complaint to the Attorney General for the State of New York at: 28 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10005. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. A Second Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 18, 2022 White Plains, New York

KENNETH M. KARAS United States District Judge DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

1. John Morley, M.D. Chief Medical Officer 1220 Washington Avenue, Bldg. 9 Albany, NY 12226 2. Dr. Mikhail Gusman, M.D./Mental Health Provide Sullivan Correctional Facility 325 Riverside Drive, P.O. Box 116 Fallsburg, NY 12733 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CVE Write the full name of each plaintiff. (Include case number if one has been assigned)

“against- COMPLAINT (Prisoner) Do you want a jury trial? ssssssss...0.0.0. L1Yes LINo

Write the full name of each defendant. If you cannot fit the names of all of the defendants in the space provided, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section IV.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual’s full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See

Washington v. Downstate Administrative Nurse, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Washington v. Downstate Administrative Nurse (Washington v. Downstate Administrative Nurse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Pataki
378 F. App'x 50 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)