Washington State Alliance for Retired Americans v. Hobbs

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedMarch 15, 2024
Docket3:23-cv-06014
StatusUnknown

This text of Washington State Alliance for Retired Americans v. Hobbs (Washington State Alliance for Retired Americans v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington State Alliance for Retired Americans v. Hobbs, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 8 WASHINGTON STATE ALLIANCE FOR 9 RETIRED AMERICANS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 STEVE HOBBS, in his official capacity as Case No. 3:23-cv-06014 Washington State Secretary of State, MARY CONSENT JUDGMENT AND 13 HALL, in her official capacity as Thurston County DECREE Auditor, and JULIE WISE, in her official capacity 14 as King County Elections Director, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff the Washington State Alliance for Retired Americans (the “Alliance”); 18 Defendants Steve Hobbs, in his official capacity as Washington Secretary of State; Mary Hall, in 19 her official capacity as Thurston County Auditor; and Julie Wise, in her official capacity as the 20 King County Elections Director (the “Parties”) stipulate the following and request that the Court 21 approve this Consent Judgement and Decree. This Consent Judgment and Decree encompasses the 22 Alliance’s claims that the state’s 30-day pre-election durational residency requirement imposed on 23 registrants and voters, codified at RCW 29A.08.230, RCW 29A.08.210, RCW 29A.08.420, CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DECREE - 1 Ben Stafford 1 RCW 29A.40.091(2), and WAC 434-230-015(3)(c), violates Section 202(c) of the Voting Rights 2 Act Amendments of 1970 (“VRA”), 52 U.S.C. § 10502(c), and the First and Fourteenth 3 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV. 4 I. RECITALS

5 WHEREAS on November 7, 2023, the Alliance filed a complaint, and on November 20, 6 filed an amended complaint, against Steve Hobbs in his official capacity as Washington Secretary 7 of State, Mary Hall in her official capacity as Thurston County Auditor, and Julie Wise in her 8 official capacity as King County Elections Director, alleging that the requirement that a registrant 9 or voter has resided at their Washington state address for at least 30-days before election day, as 10 codified at RCW 29A.08.230, RCW 29A.08.210, RCW 29A.08.420, RCW 29A.40.091(2), and 11 WAC 434-230-015(3)(c) (collectively, the “Durational Residency Requirement”), violates Section 12 202(c) of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970 (“VRA”), 52 U.S.C. § 10502, and the First 13 and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution; 14 WHEREAS the Alliance seeks to enjoin enforcement of the Durational Residency

15 Requirement, including as applied in the oaths administered on Washington voter registration 16 forms, RCW 29A.08.230, RCW 29A.08.210, RCW 29A.08.420, mail ballot security envelopes, 17 RCW 29A.40.091(2), and declarations accompanying all ballots, WAC 434-230-015(3)(c); 18 WHEREAS Section 202 of the Voting Rights Act explicitly prohibits any durational 19 residency requirement with regard to presidential elections, providing that: “No citizen of the 20 United States who is otherwise qualified to vote in any election for President and Vice President 21 shall be denied the right to vote . . . in such election because of the failure of such citizen to comply 22 with any durational residency requirement of such State or political subdivision.” 52 U.S.C. § 23 10502(c);

CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DECREE - 2 Ben Stafford 1 WHEREAS the Washington State Legislature adopted same-day voter registration, 2 eliminating any requirement that voters be registered for any particular duration of time before 3 voting in Washington State (“durational registration requirement”). 2018 Wash. Laws, ch. 112. As

4 a result of this change, Washington residents who have lived at a particular address longer than 30 5 days do not have to meet any durational limits to vote, while new residents must meet the 30-day 6 Durational Residency Requirement; 7 WHEREAS durational residency requirements are unconstitutional under the Fourteenth 8 Amendment of the U.S. Constitution when the State does not also impose a durational registration 9 requirement of at least equal length. See Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (1972); Marston v. 10 Lewis, 410 U.S. 679 (1973); Burns v. Fortson, 410 U.S. 686 (1973); 11 WHEREAS Defendant Steve Hobbs is the Secretary of State of Washington and is “the 12 chief election officer for all federal, state, county, city, town, and district elections,” RCW 13 29A.04.230, and is responsible for administrating federal and state elections, RCW 43.07.310,

14 producing voter registration applications and furnishing them to county election officials, RCW 15 29A.08.260(1), and promulgating rules governing “voter registration applications and records,” 16 “[t]he use of voter registration information in the conduct of elections,” and “the format of all voter 17 registration applications,” RCW 29A.04.611(15), (16); RCW 29A.08.220(1); 18 WHEREAS Defendant Mary Hall is the Auditor in Thurston County (a noncharter 19 county), and Defendant Julie Wise is the Elections Director for King County (a charter county), 20 and Ms. Hall and Ms. Wise serve as their respective county’s election official who maintains voter 21 registration and conducts elections. See, e.g., RCW 29A.04.025 (“‘County auditor’ means the 22 county auditor in a noncharter county or the officer, irrespective of title, having the overall

23 responsibility to maintain voter registration and to conduct state and local elections in a charter CONSENT JUDGMENT AND DECREE - 3 Ben Stafford 1 county.”); RCW 29A.04.216

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunn v. Blumstein
405 U.S. 330 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Marston v. Lewis
410 U.S. 679 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Burns v. Fortson
410 U.S. 686 (Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Washington State Alliance for Retired Americans v. Hobbs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-state-alliance-for-retired-americans-v-hobbs-wawd-2024.