Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Wilkinson

2 A. 338, 1 Sadler 263, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 606
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 9, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 A. 338 (Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Wilkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Wilkinson, 2 A. 338, 1 Sadler 263, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 606 (Pa. 1885).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff in error has no right of eminent domain. It did not give to- the contractor full control of the work. The agreement with him expressly declares if it is not done in a manner satisfactory to the superintendent he may put men in the trench, at the expense of the contractor, to make the necessary change; and further, if the contractor fails to- prosecute the work, with due diligence, the company may finish the same and charge it to the contractor. The assignment of error is not sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Foehr v. New York Short Line Railroad
40 Pa. Super. 7 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Foltier v. Schroder
70 La. Ann. 17 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A. 338, 1 Sadler 263, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-natural-gas-co-v-wilkinson-pa-1885.