Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Wilkinson

2 A. 338, 1 Sadler 263, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 606
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 9, 1885·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff in error has no right of eminent domain. It did not give to- the contractor full control of the work. The agreement with him expressly declares if it is not done in a manner satisfactory to the superintendent he may put men in the trench, at the expense of the contractor, to make the necessary change; and further, if the contractor fails to- prosecute the work, with due diligence, the company may finish the same and charge it to the contractor. The assignment of error is not sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Wilkinson, 2 A. 338, 1 Sadler 263, 1885 Pa. LEXIS 606 (Pa. 1885).

2 A. 338 (Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Wilkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foehr v. New York Short Line Railroad
40 Pa. Super. 7 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)
Foltier v. Schroder
70 La. Ann. 17 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1867)