Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Wallace

982 N.E.2d 691, 134 Ohio St. 3d 359
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 2012
DocketNos. 2011-1693 and 2011-1694
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 982 N.E.2d 691 (Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. v. Wallace, 982 N.E.2d 691, 134 Ohio St. 3d 359 (Ohio 2012).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified-conflict question is answered in the negative. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Schwartzwald, 134 Ohio St.3d 13, 2012-Ohio-5017, 979 N.E.2d 1214.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace
2016 Ohio 7992 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
Washington Mut. Bank v. Wallace
2014 Ohio 5317 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace
2012 Ohio 5495 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 N.E.2d 691, 134 Ohio St. 3d 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-mutual-bank-fa-v-wallace-ohio-2012.