Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace
This text of 2012 Ohio 5495 (Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace, 134 Ohio St.3d 359, 2012-Ohio-5495.]
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A., APPELLEE, v. WALLACE, APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank, F.A. v. Wallace, 134 Ohio St.3d 359, 2012-Ohio-5495.] Certified conflict question answered in the negative—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Schwartzwald. (Nos. 2011-1693 and 2011-1694—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No. CA2010-10-103, 2011-Ohio-4174. __________________ {¶ 1} The certified-conflict question is answered in the negative. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with Fed. Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v. Schwartzwald, 134 Ohio St.3d 13, 2012-Ohio-5017, 979 N.E.2d 1214. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Thompson Hine, L.L.P., Scott A. King, and Terry W. Posey Jr., for appellee. Andrew M. Engel, for appellant, Betty Wallace. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 5495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-mut-bank-fa-v-wallace-ohio-2012.