Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley

Ohio Supreme Court

Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley

2009 Ohio 2611

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 10, 2009

Docket2008-1056

StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 2611 (Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley, 2009 Ohio 2611 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

[Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley, 122 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2009-Ohio-2611.]

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FKA WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA v. BEATLEY ET AL., APPELLANTS; FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, RECEIVER, APPELLEE. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley, 122 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2009-Ohio-2611.] Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified. (No. 2008-1056 — Submitted May 19, 2009 — Decided June 10, 2009.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 06AP-1189, 2008-Ohio-1679. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., Charles A. Bowers, and Gregory J. O’Brien, for appellee. Kevin E. Humphreys, for appellants. ______________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley, 122 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2009-Ohio-2611.]

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FKA WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA v. BEATLEY ET AL., APPELLANTS; FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, RECEIVER, APPELLEE. [Cite as Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley, 122 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2009-Ohio-2611.] Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified. (No. 2008-1056 — Submitted May 19, 2009 — Decided June 10, 2009.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 06AP-1189, 2008-Ohio-1679. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, L.L.P., Charles A. Bowers, and Gregory J. O’Brien, for appellee. Kevin E. Humphreys, for appellants. ______________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 2611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-mut-bank-v-beatley-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack