Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley

Ohio Supreme Court

Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley

891 N.E.2d 767, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1405

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 6, 2008

Docket2008-1056

StatusPublished

This text of 891 N.E.2d 767 (Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington Mut. Bank v. Beatley, 891 N.E.2d 767, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

Opinions

Franklin App. No. 06AP-1189, 2008-Ohio-1679. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed May 20, 2008:

“When a trial court dismisses a plaintiffs action for lack of capacity to maintain an action, does R.C. 1703.29 prevent the plaintiff from appealing that decision?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 06AP-1189, 2008-Ohio-1679. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed May 20, 2008:

“When a trial court dismisses a plaintiffs action for lack of capacity to maintain an action, does R.C. 1703.29 prevent the plaintiff from appealing that decision?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

891 N.E.2d 767, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-mut-bank-v-beatley-ohio-2008.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack