Washington Davis v. the Fulton County Snap Program

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 14, 2024
DocketA24D0332
StatusPublished

This text of Washington Davis v. the Fulton County Snap Program (Washington Davis v. the Fulton County Snap Program) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Washington Davis v. the Fulton County Snap Program, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 14, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24D0332. WASHINGTON DAVIS v. THE FULTON COUNTY SNAP PROGRAM.

Based on the extremely limited application materials, it appears that Washington Davis filed a mandamus action in the superior court against the Fulton County SNAP Program. Davis later filed a motion for default judgment against the defendant. The superior court denied Davis’s motion and dismissed his petition. He then filed a timely application for discretionary review in the Supreme Court,1 which transferred the matter here upon finding no basis for jurisdiction there. See Case No. S24D0788 (Apr. 11, 2024). OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (7) permits a direct appeal from a judgment “granting or refusing to grant mandamus[.]” See Carson v. Brown, 348 Ga. App. 689, 690 (1) (a) (824 SE2d 605) (2019). No provision of the discretionary appeal statute, OCGA § 5-6- 35, appears to apply here. We will grant a timely application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED, and Davis shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal with the superior court. The clerk of the superior court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

1 Although Davis’s filing was titled “Petition for a Writ of Mandamus,” the Supreme Court interpreted it as an application for discretionary review of the superior court’s ruling. We will do likewise. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/14/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tom Brown v. E. Howard Carson, Jr.
824 S.E.2d 605 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Washington Davis v. the Fulton County Snap Program, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-davis-v-the-fulton-county-snap-program-gactapp-2024.