Washington Davis v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Washington Davis v. City of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 2023

DocketA24D0102

StatusPublished

This text of Washington Davis v. City of New York (Washington Davis v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Washington Davis v. City of New York, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 27, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24D0102. WASHINGTON DAVIS v. CITY OF NEW YORK.

Washington Davis filed a civil action against the City of New York, which the trial court dismissed on May 4, 2023.1 On September 7, 2023, Davis filed a “petition for a writ of certiorari” in the Supreme Court, which was docketed as an application for discretionary appeal. The Supreme Court transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S24D0111 (Sept. 20, 2023). We, however, lack jurisdiction. The order granting the defendant’s motions to dismiss is a final judgment, as nothing remains pending in the court below. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). Accordingly, the order is subject to direct appeal. See, e.g., Green Tree Servicing v. Jones, 333 Ga. App. 184, 184 (1) (775 SE2d 714) (2015). Ordinarily, when a party has a right of direct appeal and files an application for discretionary appeal, we will grant the application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). However, the application for a discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the order being appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Here, Davis filed his application over four months after entry of the order he seeks to appeal. Given that the application is untimely, we are without jurisdiction to consider it. See Crosson v. Conway, 291 Ga. 220, 220 (1) (728 SE2d 617) (2012); see also Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989) (“The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this [C]ourt cannot accept an appeal not

1 Davis moved for reconsideration of the trial court’s order, and the trial court denied his motion on May 15, 2023. An order resolving a motion for reconsideration is not itself a directly appealable judgment. See Ferguson v. Freeman, 282 Ga. 180, 181 (1) (646 SE2d 65) (2007); Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 510 (536 SE2d 187) (2000). made in compliance therewith.”). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/27/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 27, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24D0102. WASHINGTON DAVIS v. CITY OF NEW YORK.

Washington Davis filed a civil action against the City of New York, which the trial court dismissed on May 4, 2023.1 On September 7, 2023, Davis filed a “petition for a writ of certiorari” in the Supreme Court, which was docketed as an application for discretionary appeal. The Supreme Court transferred the case to this Court. See Case No. S24D0111 (Sept. 20, 2023). We, however, lack jurisdiction. The order granting the defendant’s motions to dismiss is a final judgment, as nothing remains pending in the court below. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). Accordingly, the order is subject to direct appeal. See, e.g., Green Tree Servicing v. Jones, 333 Ga. App. 184, 184 (1) (775 SE2d 714) (2015). Ordinarily, when a party has a right of direct appeal and files an application for discretionary appeal, we will grant the application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). However, the application for a discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the order being appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). Here, Davis filed his application over four months after entry of the order he seeks to appeal. Given that the application is untimely, we are without jurisdiction to consider it. See Crosson v. Conway, 291 Ga. 220, 220 (1) (728 SE2d 617) (2012); see also Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989) (“The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and this [C]ourt cannot accept an appeal not

1 Davis moved for reconsideration of the trial court’s order, and the trial court denied his motion on May 15, 2023. An order resolving a motion for reconsideration is not itself a directly appealable judgment. See Ferguson v. Freeman, 282 Ga. 180, 181 (1) (646 SE2d 65) (2007); Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 510 (536 SE2d 187) (2000). made in compliance therewith.”). Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/27/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Washington Davis v. City of New York, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/washington-davis-v-city-of-new-york-gactapp-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack