Warwick v. Maneely
This text of 104 P.2d 838 (Warwick v. Maneely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to 4 Civil No. 2544 (ante, p. 235 [104 Pac. (2d) 831]), the decision in which has this day been filed. The plaintiff herein is the daughter of the plaintiff in the other action and she was injured in the same accident. The actions were tried together but separate appeals were taken which have been presented upon separate clerk's transcripts and on the same reporter’s transcript. The questions involved and all material matters are identical in the two actions.
For the reasons given in the opinion referred to the judgment in favor of the plaintiff is reversed and the judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the defendants Harrah and Stewart & Nuss, Inc., is affirmed.
Marks, J., and Griffin, J., concurred.
A petition by plaintiff and appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on September 19, 1940.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 P.2d 838, 40 Cal. App. 2d 813, 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warwick-v-maneely-calctapp-1940.