Warren v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company

D. Nevada

Warren v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company

DecidedFebruary 9, 2024

Docket2:23-cv-00601

StatusUnknown

This text of Warren v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (Warren v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, (D. Nev. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 ALLANNA WARREN, Case No. 2:23-cv-00601-GMN-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 8 Defendant. 9 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 45 Subpoena, 11 styled as a motion on the docket, seeking production of document from Defendant. ECF No. 12 100. The Court exercises its inherent authority to manage discovery and control its docket rather 13 than require wasteful motion practice that is contrary to Rule 1 of the Federal Rules. 14 A Rule 45 subpoena “cannot be used to circumvent Rule 34 or the other discovery 15 rules.” McCall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2:16-cv-01058-JAD-GWF, 2017 WL 3174914, 16 *6 (D. Nev. 2017). Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows for one party to request 17 documents from another party. A request for production of documents is the proper and the primary 18 way to obtain documents from an opposing party. 8A Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice 19 and Procedure § 2204 at 365 (2nd ed. 1994), (Rule 45 should not be allowed when it circumvents 20 the requirements and protections of Rule 34). 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena is quashed and 22 the docket is to reflect ECF No. 100 is DENIED. 23 Dated this 9th day of February, 2024. 24 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 ALLANNA WARREN, Case No. 2:23-cv-00601-GMN-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 8 Defendant. 9 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 45 Subpoena, 11 styled as a motion on the docket, seeking production of document from Defendant. ECF No. 12 100. The Court exercises its inherent authority to manage discovery and control its docket rather 13 than require wasteful motion practice that is contrary to Rule 1 of the Federal Rules. 14 A Rule 45 subpoena “cannot be used to circumvent Rule 34 or the other discovery 15 rules.” McCall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2:16-cv-01058-JAD-GWF, 2017 WL 3174914, 16 *6 (D. Nev. 2017). Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows for one party to request 17 documents from another party. A request for production of documents is the proper and the primary 18 way to obtain documents from an opposing party. 8A Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice 19 and Procedure § 2204 at 365 (2nd ed. 1994), (Rule 45 should not be allowed when it circumvents 20 the requirements and protections of Rule 34). 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena is quashed and 22 the docket is to reflect ECF No. 100 is DENIED. 23 Dated this 9th day of February, 2024. 24 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Warren v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-the-lincoln-national-life-insurance-company-nvd-2024.