Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Warren v. State

Warren v. State

942 So. 2d 465, 2006 WL 3422076
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Warren v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 924 So. 2d 979 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 2006·No. 4D05-4779·Published

Opinion

942 So.2d 465 (2006)

Randolph E. WARREN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-4779.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 29, 2006.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tom Wm. Odom, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Thomas A. Palmer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the prosecutor's comment in closing argument in light of Rodriguez v. State, 753 So.2d 29, 37 (Fla. 2000), and conclude the comment was not directed at a point which only the defendant could contradict. Therefore, we affirm.

GROSS, HAZOURI, JJ., and MAASS, ELIZABETH T., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. State, 942 So. 2d 465, 2006 WL 3422076 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

942 So. 2d 465 (Warren v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodriguez v. State
753 So. 2d 29 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Gould v. State
942 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)