Warren v. State

884 So. 2d 252, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11763, 2004 WL 1778258

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Warren v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 924 So. 2d 979 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 2004·No. No. 2D03-3163·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As we did in Lee v. State, 854 So.2d 709 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), we certify the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:

MAY AN INDIVIDUAL BE COMMITTED UNDER THE JIMMY RYCE ACT IN THE ABSENCE OF A JURY INSTRUCTION THAT THE STATE MUST PROVE THAT THE INDIVIDUAL HAS SERIOUS DIFFICULTY IN CONTROLLING HIS OR HER DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR?

ALTENBERND, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As we did in Lee v. State, 854 So.2d 709 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), we certify the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:

MAY AN INDIVIDUAL BE COMMITTED UNDER THE JIMMY RYCE ACT IN THE ABSENCE OF A JURY INSTRUCTION THAT THE STATE MUST PROVE THAT THE INDIVIDUAL HAS SERIOUS DIFFICULTY IN CONTROLLING HIS OR HER DANGEROUS BEHAVIOR?

ALTENBERND, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Warren v. State, 884 So. 2d 252, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11763, 2004 WL 1778258 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

884 So. 2d 252 (Warren v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Lee v. State

854 So. 2d 709 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Opinion

Related