Warren v. Hugo Scherer Estate, Inc.
261 N.W. 319, 272 Mich. 254, 1935 Mich. LEXIS 473
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 3, 1935
DocketDocket No. 92, Calendar No. 38,367.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 261 N.W. 319 (Warren v. Hugo Scherer Estate, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Warren v. Hugo Scherer Estate, Inc., 261 N.W. 319, 272 Mich. 254, 1935 Mich. LEXIS 473 (Mich. 1935).
Opinions
I cannot concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Edward M. Sharpe.
Plaintiff’s claim of fraud is too stale to justify rescission. Rescission is not a remedy available in avoidance of the statute of limitations.
*255 The decree is reversed and the bill dismissed, with costs to defendant.
North, Fead, Butzel, and Bushnell, JJ., concurred with Wiest, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thomas A. Fox, et al. v. County of Saginaw, et al.
E.D. Michigan, 2025
Arkona, LLC, et al. v. County of Cheboygan, et al.
E.D. Michigan, 2025
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
261 N.W. 319, 272 Mich. 254, 1935 Mich. LEXIS 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-hugo-scherer-estate-inc-mich-1935.