Warren v. Hugo Scherer Estate, Inc.

261 N.W. 319, 272 Mich. 254, 1935 Mich. LEXIS 473

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 1935·No. Docket No. 92, Calendar No. 38,367.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Wiest, J.

I cannot concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Edward M. Sharpe.

Plaintiff’s claim of fraud is too stale to justify rescission. Rescission is not a remedy available in avoidance of the statute of limitations.

*255 The decree is reversed and the bill dismissed, with costs to defendant.

North, Fead, Butzel, and Bushnell, JJ., concurred with Wiest, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. Hugo Scherer Estate, Inc., 261 N.W. 319, 272 Mich. 254, 1935 Mich. LEXIS 473 (Mich. 1935).

Pincite

261 N.W. 319 (Warren v. Hugo Scherer Estate, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.